mrs_sweetpeach: (Default)
Dan made me laugh so hard that I was literally doubled over with laughter:

HEY, EVERYBODY: You know how Mormons “baptize” dead people who weren’t Mormons—including Holocaust victims—because Mormons believe they have a right to choose Mormonism for the deceased? And you know how the Mormon Church says that being gay is a choice? The same church that doesn’t think you should have a choice about being posthumously baptized? Well, now you can choose homosexuality for dead Mormons! Just go to AllDeadMormonsAreNowGay.com, enter the name of a deceased Mormon or ask the site to find a dead Mormon for you, and—presto!—that dead Mormon gets to have a gay afterlife!


On a more serious note, I'm not actually sure how I feel about baptizing dead people. It seems disrespectful to baptize people against their will including, therefore, dead people. And being somewhere between atheist and agnostic myself, the whole baptism thing seems silly. I can empathize with relatives who feel angry, upset, or unhappy when this happens to their ancestors and I wonder if the people arranging the baptisms are doing it with pure hearts.
mrs_sweetpeach: (Default)
Dan's had a great idea, which he talks about in today's column (http://www.avclub.com/articles/september-22-2010,45429/?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=feeds&utm_source=type_savage-love).

Check out the youtube channel, particularly if you've been curious as to what his boyfriend looks like. (And, omg, their kid's 13 already -- it seems like it was only a year or two ago that they were adopting him.)
mrs_sweetpeach: (Default)
Dan, you're a witty guy and full of wisdom. I wish I could think as clearly on complex matters and do so with an equivalent amount of style. Today's column was ftw. You and your coining of phrases. ilu

http://www.avclub.com/articles/may-12-2010,41017/?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=feeds&utm_source=type_savage-love
mrs_sweetpeach: (Default)
I'm a huge fan of Dan Savage and his advice column. The new column came out today and, as usual, I saw Savage's photo and thought to myself Hey! He looks like a young version of Detective Munch! If this were a normal Wednesday, I would have become so engrossed by the questions I'd have forgotten all about Munch, but today's column was the closest thing to RPS I have ever encountered in a newspaper advice column (RPS=Real People Slash for those unfamiliar with the term), and I started wondering how I'd feel about a half-RPS crossover with John Munch and Dan Savage. I have mixed feelings about RPS, which is I doubt I could ever write one myself, and is also why I think of Munch as Munch rather than as Richard Belzer.

Click here for comparison photos )

It wasn't until I was driving home that the answer occurred to me: I'd be absolutely delighted to read a crossover featuring both Munch and Savage if Savage wrote it himself. Of course, if I'm being honest, I'd read any story (gen, slash, or half-RPS) featuring these two just to see where the author went with it.

Profile

mrs_sweetpeach: (Default)
mrs_sweetpeach

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 23 45
678 9101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 22nd, 2025 04:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios