Graphics help needed
May. 21st, 2009 12:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For the past couple of weeks I've been struggling with getting new business cards printed for the company. I use gimp as my graphics program, which means I get to specify color in RGB (and changing to a different graphics program is not an option). The printer, naturally, specifies its colors in CMYK. The company logo is supposed to be Pantone Blue. According to something I found somewhere on the web, Pantone Blue is 0.96,0,0,0 in CMYK. And according to http://web.forret.com, this translates to 10,255,255 in RGB (or, in hex, OAFFFF).
In an attempt to get the company logo to print in the correct shade of blue, I changed the blue of the logo from whatever it was in the graphics file (which turned into a muddy purple blue when the first set of cards came back from the printer) to OAFFFF.
Being a suspicious sort, I sent email to the printer with the new graphics image attached and asked them to look at it and tell me if it would print in Pantone Blue (or something reasonably close) before I ordered another full set.
I received a reply saying "The OAFFFF color is a bright sea green and when I convert it to CMYK, it is a darker bluish-green color." To my eye, looking at a swatch of Pantone Blue in the Pantone Color Guide, Pantone Blue is not at all green. I know that colors appear differently on different computer hardware, so the fact that the 0AFFFF version of the logo appears to be a very bright turquoise on my monitor does not mean much. But it still disturbs me that my printer rep sees the logo quite differently on her screen and that she tells me that it will print as bluish-green.
Having said all of that, should I go with the OAFFFF version of the logo? Should I change the logo to some other color and if so, what RGB do I use to end up with a logo that will print in a blue that looks like Pantone Blue?
In an attempt to get the company logo to print in the correct shade of blue, I changed the blue of the logo from whatever it was in the graphics file (which turned into a muddy purple blue when the first set of cards came back from the printer) to OAFFFF.
Being a suspicious sort, I sent email to the printer with the new graphics image attached and asked them to look at it and tell me if it would print in Pantone Blue (or something reasonably close) before I ordered another full set.
I received a reply saying "The OAFFFF color is a bright sea green and when I convert it to CMYK, it is a darker bluish-green color." To my eye, looking at a swatch of Pantone Blue in the Pantone Color Guide, Pantone Blue is not at all green. I know that colors appear differently on different computer hardware, so the fact that the 0AFFFF version of the logo appears to be a very bright turquoise on my monitor does not mean much. But it still disturbs me that my printer rep sees the logo quite differently on her screen and that she tells me that it will print as bluish-green.
Having said all of that, should I go with the OAFFFF version of the logo? Should I change the logo to some other color and if so, what RGB do I use to end up with a logo that will print in a blue that looks like Pantone Blue?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 07:06 pm (UTC)When we do the music boosters newsletters, we give them a multiple-layer PDF and specify a pantone color for each layer. They use that to print a year's worth of blank newsletter front pages. Then when we have a new newsletter, we give them a PDF of just the text, to be printed black over the previously-printed blanks.
I thought business cards were usually printed the same way; the company had a hundred thousand cards printed with just the logo, then ordered a few hundred at a time per person with their specifics on it.
If you really are doing CYMK printed business cards, there is a CYMK plugin for Gimp.
I don't think I found any two sources online agree about what blue was, even "blue 072" had varying values.
This may be useful:
http://www.benedict.edu/divisions/inseff/mis/pdf/web/bc_web_dev_pantone_color_bridge_cmyk_pc.pdf
Lists blue-072 as:
100C 85M 0Y 4K
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 07:56 pm (UTC)wish i could help more but it's been too long since i've done prepress stuff
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:12 pm (UTC)I haven't had to do any prepress work since 1992 -- and even then I wasn't good at it. I have zero graphics training and don't know what I'm doing more than half the time.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:05 pm (UTC)I'd visit our previous printer, but they seem to have gone under. Probably because their prices were 3x higher than any of the online places.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:25 pm (UTC)I found our blue, and as my notes said, it's between 306 and 307.
And better, it gives this info:
PANTONE Pro. Blue PC
C:100 M:13 Y:1 K:3
When I put it into the color converter thing, I come up with RGB 0,215,0 or 00d700 in hex. Which explains why my rep kept saying "green" -- 00d700 *is* green and not the right color.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 09:00 pm (UTC)Today's thought was to create fake 4x6" photos and send them over to Costco for printing. Fake photos containing various screencaptures, such as part of the pdf file
Although for all I know, the photo printers used by Costco have nothing in common with the printers used by folks like 123print and I'll have basically thrown away my afternoon and one of my own dollars buying the photos.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 12:17 am (UTC)Anyway, it says the equivalent is R:0 G:152 B:214 which sounds reasonable, and doesn't shift color to my eye. (besides I trust PS)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-22 04:44 am (UTC)The good news is that Pantone Blue (assuming you mean standard 072C) has fairly reliable CMYK and RGB gamut recipes:
R28 G63 B128
or
C100 M88 K5
The bad news?
Generating Pantone equivalent solid colors from an RGB workflow that doesn't support any kind of industry standard color profiling is going to be *complete* voodoo.
I don't know enough about Gimp to be helpful with the specific levers and buttons necessary to make it perform said magic, but unless you can specify exact color proportions in CMYK (which is what the printer is going to use for process color) then you would need a device-specific calibration profile (typically an ICC profile) from your printer to make the necessary RGB to CMYK gamut conversion. If that's not an option, then the only way to get a reliable representation of the blue from them is going to be the "throwing darts" method because every piece of software gets from RGB to CMYK via a conversion table and there are many - so you need control over which one is used.
Literally until the past few years, color management was the bane of most designers' existences. Printing the same job with 5 different printers or on 5 different devices, until very recently, would always give you 5 measurably different results.
I'll happily help you with the file, as with the right tools it's a trivial step - but without them it's a complete pain in the pesqueeter.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 03:13 am (UTC)