![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Well, in comparison
Apr. 13th, 2012 01:02 pm
While poking around the web this morning, I somehow fell upon this story:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128662/56-stars-tattooed-Belgian-womans-face-visible-year-planned-laser-surgery.html?ICO=most_read_module
There are three photos of the girl in the story. In the first, she looks sad. The second one must have been taken when her tattoos were new as they are extremely black. In the third, although they are still visible they look faded and I think she looks good with them. The best part is that the article pairs that picture with one of her tattoo artist, and compared to him, her facial tattoos are barely worth mentioning.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128662/56-stars-tattooed-Belgian-womans-face-visible-year-planned-laser-surgery.html?ICO=most_read_module
There are three photos of the girl in the story. In the first, she looks sad. The second one must have been taken when her tattoos were new as they are extremely black. In the third, although they are still visible they look faded and I think she looks good with them. The best part is that the article pairs that picture with one of her tattoo artist, and compared to him, her facial tattoos are barely worth mentioning.
